Friday, December 13, 2013

I want to continue my conversation with young women about purity. 

Over the years, I have had the pleasure of serving middle school students in our church.  Often I have posed the question, “What is purity?” The most common answer I have received to this question is not to have sex before marriage.  This is only partly right. What about everything that can occur between holding hands and intercourse?

First, let us take a look at the literal definition of the word.  The dictionary defines purity as “freedom from adulterating matter; cleanness or clearness; freedom from evil or sin; innocence; chastity”[1]  Since chastity is mentioned in the definition, I feel it is also important to define this word.  Chastity is “virtuousness; sexual abstinence; celibacy; decency or modesty.”[2]  Both of these words are associated with moral excellence and being undefiled.  It is vital that we understand this virtue in order to experience boundless intimacy within marriage and with God.  We have to get this right!

When I think of pure as an adjective, the first thing that comes to mind is pure love.  I can honestly say my love for God is pure.  As a mother, I also think about the love I have for my children.  There is something amazingly perfect about holding an infant upon your chest while he or she sleeps and listening to the gentle breathing and gazing upon the pouty lips and upturned nose.  This type of love is not clouded with ulterior motives or selfishness.  1 Corinthians 13, in the Bible is often referred to as the “love chapter.”  In it we are told that love is patient, kind, without jealousy, humble, without boasting, considerate, not easily angered, forgiving, truthful, protecting, trusting, and never failing.  Did you notice that not one sexual reference is included in that description?  In fact, you would not dare have a sensual thought about an infant or toddler!  That would be perverted; it is absolutely unthinkable!  How could there be anything pure about that?  Ah!  Now we are getting somewhere.  How is even having a sexual thought synonymous with pure love?  It’s not.

Purity is not a physical condition.  It is a state of mind.  Lusting is not pure! We know the power of the mind can do some amazing things; but on the other hand, it can also wreak havoc in a life.  Thus purity has to start in a place where no one else can see, a place where it is easy to hide our desires and dreams.  We fantasize and never even realize how it is slowly stealing something very precious from us.  Many times a girl loses her virginity before she even crawls into bed with someone.

I have spoken to more than one young lady who thinks passionately kissing a young man with her body pressed against his was okay.  After all, she was physically pure, and never in a million years would she have sex without being married.  I have always asked the young woman in question, “What were you thinking while you were making out?  More importantly, what do you think he was thinking?”  I can guarantee you he wasn’t thinking about how smart she was or what a pretty smile she had.  No, on the contrary!  Do you want a boy mentally undressing you and having sex with you during what you believe is an innocent romp? Being the mother of two teenage boys I can assure you that when a young lady is pressed against a young man, he is aware of every curve of her body and it does arouse him.  Is that fair to either one of you?  Are you remaining pure?  Are you allowing him to maintain his purity?

Your purity is a precious, beautiful gift to bestow upon your husband.  When you get to the altar and pledge your devotion to the love of your life, how much of your purity do you want to give?  How much do you want to receive?  Protect this gem at all costs, and remember the battle begins in the mind.







[1] Victoria Neufeldt, editor in chief, Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Third Edition, (Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1997), p. 1092
[2] Victoria Neufeldt, editor in chief, Webster’s New World College Dictionary, Third Edition, (Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1997), p. 237

No comments:

Post a Comment